Sunday, October 30, 2016

Blog Post 8~ Cris Tovani’s I Read It, But I Don’t Get It: Comprehension Strategies for Adolescent Readers

Blog Post 8~ Cris Tovani’s I Read It, But I Don’t Get It: Comprehension Strategies for Adolescent Readers
I enjoyed Cris Tovani’s book and how she address the fact many students actually fake read, or rather, they do whatever it takes to not read texts that they are assigned because they don’t understand what they read when they actually read it. In her classes, she tells her students “We are going to study what good readers do…. We’re going to learn to use thinking strategies.” Then she sets about doing just that.
She states there are two types of struggling readers encountered in secondary schools ~the resistive readers and word callers: “Resistive readers can read but choose not to; Word callers can decode the words but don’t understand stand or remember what they’ve read.”
Reading goes beyond thinking and constructing meaning, and it’s more than word pronunciation. Researchers define it as a complex, recursive thinking process. By utilizing years of research on proficient readers’ characteristics, they isolated seven strategies used by successful readers of all ages:
• They use existing knowledge to make sense of new information.
• They ask questions about the text before, during, and after reading.
• They draw inferences from the text.
• They monitor their comprehension.
• They use “fix-up” strategies when meaning breaks down.
• They determine what is important.
• They synthesize information to create new thinking.
Tovani states that “Twenty-five years ago Rumelhart (1976) identified six cueing systems that readers use to understand text.” She discusses those cueing systems; the first three are surface structures, typically emphasized during primary grades providing readers visual/auditory clues for pronouncing/recognizing words and sentence structure comprehension: Graphophonic cues relating to letters, letter combinations, and associated sounds. Lexical cues relate to words, including instantaneous recognition, but not always their associated meaning. Syntactic cues relate to form/structure of words/sentences making up pieces of texts, including if they have cohesive organization and or “sound right.”
The last three-cueing systems are deep structures, allowing readers to interpret/analyze/draw textual inferences. They are rarely openly taught at middle/secondary level, even if they’re the means by which we comprehend difficult text. Semantic cues relate meaning(s), concepts, and or associations of words/longer pieces of text, including understanding subtle definitions/nuances. Schematic cues relate readers’ prior knowledge/personal
Experiences, allow readers to understand/remember their readings. (Cues group/organize New information into memory.) Pragmatic cues relate what readers consider important/what he or she needs in understanding a particular purpose while including social constructions of meaning, where reading groups arrive at shared meaning/abstract interpretations.
I felt these points were important to understand because they had to do with how students developed/acquired knowledge and process it. We as teachers cannot help our student “fix” a process if we cannot understand it in the first place.
Tovani states that a reader’s purpose affects everything concerning reading; purpose controls/drives what is considered important inside texts, what readers remember, and what comprehension strategy reader’s use in enhancing meaning. If students read difficult texts without a purpose, expect them to express complaints.
Tovani has six signals that indicate confusion when reading. Our job as teachers is to help students recognize these six signals and point out how to know when they are confused. She recommends posting these six indicators somewhere inside your classroom for student viewing:
• The inner voice inside the reader’s head stops its conversation with the text, and the reader only hears his voice pronouncing the words.
• The camera inside the reader’s head shuts off, and the reader can no longer visualize what is happening as she reads.
• The reader’s mind begins to wander, and he catches himself thinking about something far removed from the text.
• The reader cannot remember or retell what she has read.
• The reader is not getting his clarifying questions answered.
• Characters are reappearing in the text and the reader doesn’t recall who they are.
TEACHER’S POINT: Good readers know if these behaviors occur, it is time to stop and make a plan to repair meaning:
Another tip Tovani uses is giving student’s opportunities to isolate confusion, then they can begin repairing the meaning’s breakdown. She recommends teaching them to utilize sticky notes, by putting them next to passages causing confusion; this way, they can return later to try clarifying it.
I enjoyed Tovani’s explanation for students that readers hear voices as they read. She recommends sharing voices you hear as you read and pointing out that sometimes voices in your head may only recite words. The importance comes from acknowledging this happens to you too. You should tell students that you turn the reciting voice into a conversing voice. Explaining how sometimes the voice distracts you from textual meaning. Show students how to bring yourself back into texts.
I love these strategies, and I think they speak for themselves.
Strategies to “Fix Up” Confusion
• Make a prediction.
• Make a connection between the text and:
• Your life.
• Your knowledge of the world.
• Another text.
• Stop and think about what you have already read.
• Ask yourself a question and try to answer it.
• Reflect in writing on what you have read.
• Visualize.
• Use print conventions.
• Retell what you’ve read.
• Reread.
• Notice patterns in text structure.
• Adjust your reading rate: slow down or speed up.
While I cannot write on everything Cris Tovani has to offer in her book (as that would require re-writing it), I have provided you with my favorites, and the things that I remembered from reading it a few weeks ago. These are the things that stuck me the most after all that time. I also see myself incorporating them in a future classroom at some point, which is the true hallmark of a great resource~ actually seeing yourself using it.
Citation: Cris Tovani. I Read It, but I Don’t Get It: Comprehension Strategies for Adolescent Readers. Kindle Edition.

Friday, October 21, 2016

Blog Post 7~ Ernest Morrell’s “Critical Literacy and Popular Culture in Urban Education: Toward a Pedagogy of Access and Dissent”


Ernest Morrell’s article offers educators a refreshing view geared towards incorporating and balancing popular and classical literary works to create an environment that’s both fun and engaging for student’s, as well as being culturally relevant for them.
I found Morrell’s research and information to be in-depth, supported, and well thought out. At times in the article’s beginning, I felt overwhelmed with vocabulary that I needed to reference a dictionary to understand; however, I muddled through it and soon found golden nuggets of advice, which will be valuable for a future educator’s classroom. I enjoyed the examples and classroom applications he cited in his work.
I specifically enjoyed Morell’s section on using courtroom trials as a means to teach students how to make supported arguments (2007, p. 10). I found the detailed description of how he went about using this concept fascinating. Morrell’s states teachers assign each student a role and they participate (i.e. a witness’ or lawyers); however, all students make “casebooks” from which they will build their personal rhetorical essays (2007, p. 10-13). Morell states that “In making this argument she [the student] has thoroughly investigated the text and written eloquently about the most serious and debatable issues in the text” (2007, p.13). Furthermore, “The argument is clear, concise, thorough, passionate, and well written. It demonstrates how seriously the students took their roles as litigants and how the schema of the court trial allowed them to develop sophisticated arguments around a canonical literary text,” according to Morell’s article (2007, p. 13).
I feel as educators, we can never have enough tools in our metaphorical toolboxes. I always try to remember the fact that what might reach one student, or class of students, may not reach another. Moreover, my ultimate goal as an educator is seeing the lightbulb go off in every student’s eyes so that I know I am reaching my students and they are getting it. With that in mind, I am gathering as many tools and resources as possible because I will not know until I get there just which classes are waiting for this strategy.  
 There is also some great information on teachers as researchers in this article. Morell offers advice on ways educators can utilize their classroom research projects to make political and social change by involving students, communities, administration, and themselves in meaningfully accepted research projects such as academic, literary, community, political, economic, or even social… the possibilities are endless. (Morrell, 2007, pp. 13-20).  

Reference:
Morrell, E. (2007). Critical literacy and popular culture in urban education: Toward a pedagogy of access and dissent. In C. Clark & M. Blackburn (Eds.), Working with/in the local: New directions in literacy research for political action (pp. 235-254). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

Note: If the link above doesn't work, Copy & Paste the URL above into a new web browser:

Monday, October 17, 2016

Blog Post 6~ Paulo Freire’s "Pedagogy of the Oppressed" Preface, Chapter 1, & Chapter 2

Blog Post 6~ Paulo Freire’s "Pedagogy of the Oppressed" Preface, Chapter 1, & Chapter 2
 Having read through all this document offers, until the start of Chapter three, I can only say that Paulo Freire packs a lot of punch in eighty-five pages. To sum up the entirety of what is being offered would take a book in itself, and feel like a fool’s errand, especially when Paulo’s words are so articulate and well spoken. I could never begin to encapsulate or encompass in my limited vocabulary Paulo’s theories. However, I will relate to you something that struck me as inspiring, uplifting, or maybe just revolutionary in a way.

Chapter 1 contains some interesting concepts. On page 46, Paulo Freire explains that the oppressed suffer from an established contradiction in their deepest being, discovering that without freedom they can’t exist authentically. However, though they may desire that existence, also they fear it. Freire writes that sometimes the oppressed become the oppressors themselves; it is that consciousness which they have internalized. Their conflict lies within their choices; to be completely themselves or divided; to eject the oppressor within or not; to accept human camaraderie or isolation. It becomes a choice between following prescriptions or having choices. Freire describes it as choosing between being spectators or actors or choosing to speak out or stay silent. It is a tragic dilemma belonging to the oppressed and their educators must consider it.

The core problem as Paulo Freire sees it is written in this paragraph, which I will not even attempt to recapture because I think his words say it so much better that I can. In Paulo Freire’s words:

“The central problem is this: How can the oppressed, as divided, unauthentic beings, participate in developing the pedagogy of their liberation? Only as they discover themselves to be "hosts" of the oppressor can they contribute to the midwifery of their liberating pedagogy. As long as they live in the duality in which to be is to be like, and to be like is to be like the oppressor, this contribution is impossible. The pedagogy of the oppressed is an instrument for their critical discovery that both they and their oppressors are manifestations of dehumanization” (p. 46).

If you think of the accounts of prisoners in the concentration camps, you can see/remember a hierarchy among them. What the oppressed did was welcome the oppression, in many aspects, and then emulated it as well. The prisoners accepted the oppression, then they became the oppressors to those who were weaker; hence, the cycle continued. Paulo Freire’s concept that the oppressed are “hosts” of the oppressor was enlightening (46). Saying that it is only through that fact’s discovery can they truly be part of their liberation makes perfect sense (46). I find this so powerful.

There’s so much more to offer in just these few chapters of Paulo Freire’s book, and that I highly recommend you check it out. Follow the links from either above or below for a Pdf of a sample containing the first 181 pages of manuscript. Happy Reading!

Freire, Paulo. Pedagogy of the Oppressed: 30th Anniversary Edition. Bloomsbury Publishing (The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.). 2005.
Note: If the above link doesn't work, copy & paste the following URL into new browser:

Saturday, October 8, 2016

Blog Post 5~ “Secondary Standards-Based Grading and Reporting Handbook”

Blog Post 5~ “Secondary Standards-Based Grading and Reporting Handbook”
     I really love the philosophy put forth inside this handbook; it just seems intrinsic or inherent to me. If you know anything about Math and or Statistics, then a “Zero” when considering a student’s test scores is clearly an “Outlier,” and thus one should disregard it as it skews the data. (Unless your student is such a poor performer that all the scores are in the teens, and at that point let’s face it, we would have been seeking extra help for that student.) Therefore, the concept of using a “Mode” instead of a “Mean” to calculate students’ grades actually gives a better picture your students’ overall progress and makes more sense. Although, I have a good handle on Math and can reason the concept out, so I may have an unfair advantage :).
Ultimately, we want our students to learn about successes as well as succeed. Using a “Mode” to compute grades sends them the message that we care and realize that they’re not perfect. After all, neither are we. I imagine, there are classes we’ve all struggled in where we’ve had an “Outlier” and wished it wasn’t included in the data because it only brought our scores down. However, if we could measure our progress instead, we would show remarkable gains. This is what our students need as well. They need to be measured by progress and gains more than by mere test scores and averages.  

Note: if the above Link doesn’t work Copy & Paste the URL below into a new web browser/tab.

Friday, October 7, 2016

Blog Post 4~ Welcome to the Ron Clark Academy

 


Ron Clark Academy
I recommend the YouTube video entitled “Welcome to the Ron Clark Academy.” This video highlights educator’s work done at Ron Clark Academy, based in Atlanta, GA. At the same time, it shows their energy/passion. This is a non-profit school. I feel they integrate several basics essential to all children’s successful education. Specific basics include passionate teachers, high standards for students and educators both, integrating energy and physical activity into classrooms, and utilizing music/mnemonics in classroom learning. In Educational Psychology, I learned the importance of student engagement when teaching. Teachers accomplish tasks’ in several ways, including, but not limited to, incorporating physical activity in short bursts, using mnemonics/songs to aid teaching, interconnecting lessons to student’s lives, and utilizing different teaching styles. Ron Clark Academy incorporates multiple techniques in every lesson, making learning fun and engaging for its students. They provide classes for educators, enabling teachers to benefit from their wisdom, learn their style, and take it home to students. I realize not all school/districts can provide the support/services this school offers; however, educators everywhere can learn from Ron Clark Academy and make learning fun and engaging for students. Engaging students is vital. They need to find learning not only gratifying but also challenging to expectations. Teachers setting the bar high for students, while making it fun, find students rising to meet expectations set before them. Ron Clark Academy achieves this goal; thus, I recommend their video to my peers.
Reference
 [Ron Clark Academy]. (2012, January 9). Welcome to the Ron Clark Academy. [Video File]. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w5SBsk3rS6s&list=PLbIcqg6N8-3QJ6fDaiXZU5yPNa6Ooniw2.
Please Note: if the above link doesn't work, Copy & Paste the URL in a new web-browser.